Keywords:
Related Articles:
Abstract
The US-Iran relationship has been
on a roller-coaster since the Iranian Revolution of 1979. For four and half
decades, the relationship between Iran and the US (United States) has been
marked by rows and conflicts, ranging from hostage-taking and sanctions to
military confrontation. Subsequent US administrations followed a policy of
“carrots and sticks”, although, more often than not oscillated between the two
from one administration to another. A significant improvement in the
relationship occurred during the Obama administration with the inking of the
Iran nuclear deal in July 2015. However, after Obama, when President Trump came
to power, a major policy shift was evident that eventually resulted in the
withdrawal of the US from the Iran nuclear agreement. The early 2020
conflagration in the relationship, due to the killing of Major General Qassem
Suleimani, Commander of the Quds force within the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
(IRGC) had drawn the two countries onto the brink of a war. That and subsequent
incidents had increased the likelihood of a conflict manifold — low-intensity
conflict or a proxy war if not a full-fledged or total war. The relationship,
however, did not deteriorate further as some observers predicted. During the
Biden administration, a status quo was maintained albeit few sporadic
incidents. All this changed abruptly due to the Israel-Hamas war that
transformed the Middle East as a growing flashpoint. Accordingly, the paper
seeks to answer the crucial question: what are or would be the implications of
intensifying tension between the US and Iran, and especially, if there is an
escalation into military conflict direct or indirect. The paper upholds the
view that a military conflict would generate serious implications, engendering
immense consequences at the global, regional and national levels severely
undermining global peace and stability.